Quadro RTX 5000 vs RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Quadro RTX 5000
Popular choices:
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 5000
Performance Per Dollar RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro RTX 5000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 5000 | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 5000 and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Quadro RTX 5000
The Quadro RTX 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 1815 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,443 points. Launch price was $2,299.
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,848 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 5000 scores 15,443 and the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU reaches 15,848 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 5000 is built on Turing while the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 4,608 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 11.15 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 15.62 TFLOPS (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1815 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 36 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) with 384 Tensor cores vs 144.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,443 | 15,848+3% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 4608+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.15 TFLOPS | 15.62 TFLOPS+40% |
| Boost Clock | 1815 MHz | 2000 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 192+33% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 4.5 MB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48+33% | 36 |
| Tensor Cores | 384+167% | 144 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 5000 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has 8 GB. The Quadro RTX 5000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 256 GB/s (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — a 75% advantage for the Quadro RTX 5000. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 32 MB (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+75% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 12.2 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (Quadro RTX 5000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (4th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 5000 draws 230W versus the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 115W — a 66.7% difference. The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 650W (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W | 115W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 67.1 | 137.8+105% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2299 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $692 | — |
| Codename | TU104 | AD106 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #143 | #134 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX 5000 and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
