
Quadro RTX 5000

Radeon RX 7700S
Quadro RTX 5000 vs Radeon RX 7700S Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 5000 vs Radeon RX 7700S FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 5000 vs Radeon RX 7700S: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 5000
2018Why buy it
- ✅20.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Radeon RX 7700S is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌412% HIGHER MSRP$2,299 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 34.6 G3D/$ ($2,299 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌130% higher power demand at 230W vs 100W.
Radeon RX 7700S
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,850 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $2,299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 414.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 34.6 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $2,299 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 230W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 5000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 5000 vs Radeon RX 7700S Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro RTX 5000
The Quadro RTX 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 1815 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,443 points. Launch price was $2,299.

Radeon RX 7700S
The Radeon RX 7700S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,527 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 5000 scores 15,443 and the Radeon RX 7700S reaches 15,527 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 5000 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 7700S uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7700S). Raw compute: 11.15 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 20.48 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7700S). Boost clocks: 1815 MHz vs 2500 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 32 (Radeon RX 7700S) with 384 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,443 | 15,527 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+50% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.15 TFLOPS | 20.48 TFLOPS+84% |
| Boost Clock | 1815 MHz | 2500 MHz+38% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+50% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48+50% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation, but they get there through different ecosystems. The Quadro RTX 5000 uses DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7700S relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can help smooth out supported games, but they are not on the same feature stack.The Quadro RTX 5000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 7700S leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 5000 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7700S carries 8 GB. Quadro RTX 5000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7700S) — a 55.6% advantage for the Quadro RTX 5000. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 5000 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 7700S. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7700S) — the Quadro RTX 5000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+56% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 7700S). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX 5000) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7700S). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (Quadro RTX 5000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7700S).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (4th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 5000 draws 230W versus the Radeon RX 7700S's 100W — a 78.8% difference. The Radeon RX 7700S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 650W (Radeon RX 7700S). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W | 100W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 67.1 | 155.3+131% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro RTX 5000 came in at $2299, while the Radeon RX 7700S launched at $449. On MSRP, Radeon RX 7700S was 80.5% cheaper ($1850 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.7 (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 34.6 (Radeon RX 7700S) — the Radeon RX 7700S offers 416.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 7700S (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2299 | $449-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.7 | 34.6+416% |
| Codename | TU104 | Navi 33 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | January 4 2023 |
| Ranking | #143 | #140 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














