Quadro RTX 5000
Radeon Pro Vega II
Quadro RTX 5000 vs Radeon Pro Vega II Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 5000 vs Radeon Pro Vega II FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 5000 vs Radeon Pro Vega II: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 5000
2018Why buy it
- ✅39.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 230W instead of 475W, a 245W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌4.5% HIGHER MSRP$2,299 MSRPvs$2,199 MSRP
Radeon Pro Vega II
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($2,199 MSRP vs $2,299 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.1 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 5000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌106.5% higher power demand at 475W vs 230W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 5000 vs Radeon Pro Vega II Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro RTX 5000
The Quadro RTX 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 1815 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,443 points. Launch price was $2,299.
Radeon Pro Vega II
The Radeon Pro Vega II is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 3 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1574 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 475W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,597 points. Launch price was $2,199.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 5000 scores 15,443 and the Radeon Pro Vega II reaches 15,597 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 5000 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro Vega II uses GCN 5.1, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Raw compute: 11.15 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 14.09 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega II). Boost clocks: 1815 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,443 | 15,597 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 4096+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.15 TFLOPS | 14.09 TFLOPS+26% |
| Boost Clock | 1815 MHz+6% | 1720 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 192 | 256+33% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 5000 is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro Vega II does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 5000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro Vega II leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 5000 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega II carries 0 MB. Quadro RTX 5000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon Pro Vega II) — a 92.9% advantage for the Radeon Pro Vega II. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 5000 and 384-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega II.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 864 GB/s+93% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX 5000) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (Quadro RTX 5000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega II).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | VCE 4.1 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (4th Gen) | UVD 7.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 5000 draws 230W versus the Radeon Pro Vega II's 475W — a 69.5% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega II). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W-52% | 475W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 120mm |
| Slots | 2-50% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 67.1+105% | 32.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro RTX 5000 came in at $2299, while the Radeon Pro Vega II launched at $2199. On MSRP, Radeon Pro Vega II was 4.3% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.7 (Quadro RTX 5000) vs 7.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II) — the Radeon Pro Vega II offers 6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro Vega II (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2299 | $2199-4% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.7 | 7.1+6% |
| Codename | TU104 | Vega 20 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | June 3 2019 |
| Ranking | #143 | #138 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX 5000 and Radeon Pro Vega II
