G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P6000 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P6000 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P6000

2016

Why buy it

✅20.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅193% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2016 hardware with 23 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌400% higher power demand at 250W vs 50W.
❌59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

2024

Why buy it

✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 250W, a 200W reduction.
✅Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro P6000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 20.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (15,512 vs 15,073), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 16nm, 22 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro P6000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, Quadro P6000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro P6000 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P6000

The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,073 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P6000 scores 15,512 and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU reaches 15,073 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P6000 is built on Pascal while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Quadro P6000) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 2130 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P6000	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
G3D Mark Score	15,512+3%	15,073
Architecture	Pascal	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	16 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	3840+36%	2816
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.63 TFLOPS+5%	12 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1645 MHz	2130 MHz+29%
ROPs	96+100%	48
TMUs	240+173%	88
L1 Cache	1.4 MB	2.8 MB+100%
L2 Cache	3 MB	12 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P6000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Quadro P6000	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P6000 has 23 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU carries 8 GB. Quadro P6000 gives you 193% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Quadro P6000) vs 224 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — a 92.9% advantage for the Quadro P6000. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro P6000 and 128-bit on the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro P6000) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P6000	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
VRAM Capacity	23.438 GB+193%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5X	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	432 GB/s+93%	224 GB/s
Bus Width	384-bit+200%	128-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB	12 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P6000) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro P6000	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU).

Feature	Quadro P6000	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Encoder	NVENC 5.0 (2x)	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP8	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P6000 draws 250W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro P6000) vs 650W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Quadro P6000	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
TDP	250W	50W-80%
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	167mm
Height	111mm	68mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	85°C	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	62.0	301.5+386%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU (2024 vs 2016).

Feature	Quadro P6000	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
MSRP	$5999	—
Codename	GP102	AD107
Release	October 1 2016	February 12 2024
Ranking	#141	#107

Search Quadro P6000 on Amazon

Search RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.