RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs RTX A4000 Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
RTX A4000 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4000 Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A4000 Mobile.
| Insight | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile and RTX A4000 Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2115 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,909 points.
RTX A4000 Mobile
The RTX A4000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,782 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile scores 14,909 and the RTX A4000 Mobile reaches 14,782 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A4000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 5,120 (RTX A4000 Mobile). Raw compute: 12.99 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 17.2 TFLOPS (RTX A4000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 2115 MHz vs 1680 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 40 (RTX A4000 Mobile) with 96 Tensor cores vs 160.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,909 | 14,782 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 5120+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.99 TFLOPS | 17.2 TFLOPS+32% |
| Boost Clock | 2115 MHz+26% | 1680 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 80+67% |
| TMUs | 96 | 160+67% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 5 MB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+200% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 40+67% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 160+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RTX A4000 Mobile relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000 Mobile) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+200% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ada) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC (Ada) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000 Mobile).
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ada) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ada) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile draws 50W versus the RTX A4000 Mobile's 115W — a 78.8% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 500W (RTX A4000 Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-57% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 298.2+132% | 128.5 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile and RTX A4000 Mobile
