RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 30.2% higher G3D Mark score and 166.7% more VRAM (16 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU.
| Insight | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+30.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-30.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 2000 Ada Generation remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 2000 Ada Generation and GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,147 points. Launch price was $649.
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,170 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX 2000 Ada Generation scores 17,147 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU's 13,170 — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation leads by 30.2%. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 2130 MHz vs 1777 MHz. Ray tracing: 22 RT cores (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 28 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) with 88 Tensor cores vs 112.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,147+30% | 13,170 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816 | 3584+27% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS+6% |
| Boost Clock | 2130 MHz+20% | 1777 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 88 | 112+27% |
| L1 Cache | 2.8 MB | 3.5 MB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+300% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 22 | 28+27% |
| Tensor Cores | 88 | 112+27% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU has 6 GB. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) — a 31.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+167% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 336 GB/s+31% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+300% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU).
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU's 170W — a 83.3% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-59% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 167mm | — |
| Height | 68mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 245.0+216% | 77.5 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $625 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $750 | — |
| Codename | AD107 | GA106 |
| Release | February 12 2024 | October 12 2022 |
| Ranking | #107 | #147 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 2000 Ada Generation and GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
