RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Radeon Pro W5700X
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro W5700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W5700X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro W5700X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 2000 Ada Generation.
| Insight | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | RDNA 1.0 (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (305mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $750 versus $999 for the Radeon Pro W5700X, it costs 25% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 29.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+29.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($750) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($999) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 2000 Ada Generation and Radeon Pro W5700X
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,147 points. Launch price was $649.
Radeon Pro W5700X
The Radeon Pro W5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,591 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation scores 17,147 and the Radeon Pro W5700X reaches 17,591 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro W5700X uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Raw compute: 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 9.4 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700X). Boost clocks: 2130 MHz vs 2040 MHz.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,147 | 17,591+3% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816+22% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12 TFLOPS+28% | 9.4 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2130 MHz+4% | 2040 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 88 | 144+64% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+200% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W5700X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 16 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700X) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+200% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs HEVC,H.264 (Radeon Pro W5700X).
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | HEVC,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation draws 70W versus the Radeon Pro W5700X's 205W — a 98.2% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 650W (Radeon Pro W5700X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 167mm vs 305mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-66% | 205W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 167mm | 305mm |
| Height | 68mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-50% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 245.0+186% | 85.8 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation launched at $625 MSRP and currently averages $750, while the Radeon Pro W5700X launched at $999 and now averages $999. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation costs 24.9% less ($249 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.9 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 17.6 (Radeon Pro W5700X) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation offers 30.1% better value. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $625-37% | $999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $750-25% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.9+30% | 17.6 |
| Codename | AD107 | Navi 10 |
| Release | February 12 2024 | December 11 2019 |
| Ranking | #107 | #130 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 2000 Ada Generation and Radeon Pro W5700X
