RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX 2000 Ada Generation offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 2000 Ada Generation and GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,147 points. Launch price was $649.
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 1410 MHz. It has 5632 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 44 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,621 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation scores 17,147 and the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile reaches 17,621 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 5,632 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile). Raw compute: 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 15.88 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile). Boost clocks: 2130 MHz vs 1410 MHz. Ray tracing: 22 RT cores (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 44 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile) with 88 Tensor cores vs 176.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,147 | 17,621+3% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816 | 5632+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12 TFLOPS | 15.88 TFLOPS+32% |
| Boost Clock | 2130 MHz+51% | 1410 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 80+67% |
| TMUs | 88 | 176+100% |
| L1 Cache | 2.8 MB | 5.5 MB+96% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+200% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 22 | 44+100% |
| Tensor Cores | 88 | 176+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile has 8 GB. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 448 GB/s+75% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+200% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile).
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile's 140W — a 66.7% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 167mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-50% | 140W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 167mm | 0mm |
| Height | 68mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 245.0+95% | 125.9 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $625 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $750 | — |
| Codename | AD107 | GA104 |
| Release | February 12 2024 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #107 | #100 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 2000 Ada Generation and GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
