RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX A5500 Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs RTX A5500 Mobile Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs RTX A5500 Mobile FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs RTX A5500 Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
2024Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($625 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 165W, a 95W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5500 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (88 vs 232), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX A5500 Mobile
2022Why buy it
- ✅20.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅163.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (232 vs 88).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌RTX 2000 Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 27.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $625 MSRP).
- ❌135.7% higher power demand at 165W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs RTX A5500 Mobile Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,147 points. Launch price was $649.
RTX A5500 Mobile
The RTX A5500 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,120 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation scores 17,147 and the RTX A5500 Mobile reaches 17,120 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A5500 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 7,424 (RTX A5500 Mobile). Raw compute: 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 22.27 TFLOPS (RTX A5500 Mobile). Boost clocks: 2130 MHz vs 1500 MHz. Ray tracing: 22 RT cores (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 58 (RTX A5500 Mobile) with 88 Tensor cores vs 232.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,147 | 17,120 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816 | 7424+164% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12 TFLOPS | 22.27 TFLOPS+86% |
| Boost Clock | 2130 MHz+42% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 88 | 232+164% |
| L1 Cache | 2.8 MB | 7.3 MB+161% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+200% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 22 | 58+164% |
| Tensor Cores | 88 | 232+164% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A5500 Mobile supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the RTX 2000 Ada Generation is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 16 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 128-bit on the RTX A5500 Mobile. L2 Cache: 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 4 MB (RTX A5500 Mobile) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+200% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 12.2 (RTX A5500 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A5500 Mobile). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RTX A5500 Mobile).
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation draws 70W versus the RTX A5500 Mobile's 165W — a 80.9% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation) vs 650W (RTX A5500 Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 167mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-58% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 167mm | 0mm |
| Height | 68mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 245.0+136% | 103.8 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RTX 2000 Ada Generation (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | RTX 2000 Ada Generation | RTX A5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $625 | — |
| Codename | AD107 | GA103 |
| Release | February 12 2024 | March 22 2022 |
| Ranking | #107 | #110 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 2000 Ada Generation and RTX A5500 Mobile
