
RTX 2000E Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 1060

RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is significantly newer (2024 vs 2016). The RTX 2000E Ada Generation likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 51.6% higher G3D Mark score and 166.7% more VRAM (16 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1060.
| Insight | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+51.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-51.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $999 for the RTX 2000E Ada Generation, it costs 94% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 998.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+998.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($999) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 2000E Ada Generation and GeForce GTX 1060

RTX 2000E Ada Generation
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,252 points. Launch price was $649.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX 2000E Ada Generation scores 15,252 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the RTX 2000E Ada Generation leads by 51.6%. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 2130 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,252+52% | 10,064 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816+10% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12 TFLOPS+35% | 8.873 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2130 MHz+23% | 1733 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 88 | 160+82% |
| L1 Cache | 2.8 MB+198% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+500% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 1060 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) — a 16.7% advantage for the RTX 2000E Ada Generation. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the RTX 2000E Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+167% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s+17% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation draws 70W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 88% difference. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 167mm vs 173mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-61% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 400W-38% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 167mm | 173mm |
| Height | 68mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 217.9+290% | 55.9 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $999, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 94% less ($939 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.3 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 996.1% better value. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $249-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $999 | $60-94% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.3 | 167.7+996% |
| Codename | AD107 | GP104 |
| Release | February 12 2024 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #107 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















