RTX 2000E Ada Generation vs Quadro RTX 5000
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Quadro RTX 5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 5000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is significantly newer (2024 vs 2018). The RTX 2000E Ada Generation likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro RTX 5000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX 5000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 2000E Ada Generation.
| Insight | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro RTX 5000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $692 versus $999 for the RTX 2000E Ada Generation, it costs 31% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 46.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+46.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($999) | ✅More affordable ($692) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 2000E Ada Generation and Quadro RTX 5000
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,252 points. Launch price was $649.
Quadro RTX 5000
The Quadro RTX 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 1815 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,443 points. Launch price was $2,299.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation scores 15,252 and the Quadro RTX 5000 reaches 15,443 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX 5000 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000). Raw compute: 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 11.15 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000). Boost clocks: 2130 MHz vs 1815 MHz. Ray tracing: 22 RT cores (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 48 (Quadro RTX 5000) with 88 Tensor cores vs 384.
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,252 | 15,443+1% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816 | 3072+9% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12 TFLOPS+8% | 11.15 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2130 MHz+17% | 1815 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 88 | 192+118% |
| L1 Cache | 2.8 MB | 3 MB+7% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+200% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 22 | 48+118% |
| Tensor Cores | 88 | 384+336% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro RTX 5000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 16 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 5000) — a 100% advantage for the Quadro RTX 5000. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 5000) — the RTX 2000E Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 448 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+200% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX 5000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX 5000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (Quadro RTX 5000).
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation draws 70W versus the Quadro RTX 5000's 230W — a 106.7% difference. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 5000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-70% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 167mm | — |
| Height | 68mm | — |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 217.9+225% | 67.1 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $999, while the Quadro RTX 5000 launched at $2299 and now averages $692. The Quadro RTX 5000 costs 30.7% less ($307 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.3 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 22.3 (Quadro RTX 5000) — the Quadro RTX 5000 offers 45.8% better value. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999-57% | $2299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $999 | $692-31% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.3 | 22.3+46% |
| Codename | AD107 | TU104 |
| Release | February 12 2024 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #107 | #143 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 2000E Ada Generation and Quadro RTX 5000
