RTX 2000E Ada Generation vs Quadro P6000
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Quadro P6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P6000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is significantly newer (2024 vs 2016). The RTX 2000E Ada Generation likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P6000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 46.5% more VRAM (23 GB vs 16 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 2000E Ada Generation.
| Insight | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+46.5%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $999 versus $1,500 for the Quadro P6000, it costs 33% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 47.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+47.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($999) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 2000E Ada Generation and Quadro P6000
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,252 points. Launch price was $649.
Quadro P6000
The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation scores 15,252 and the Quadro P6000 reaches 15,512 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro P6000 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 3,840 (Quadro P6000). Raw compute: 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000). Boost clocks: 2130 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,252 | 15,512+2% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816 | 3840+36% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12 TFLOPS | 12.63 TFLOPS+5% |
| Boost Clock | 2130 MHz+29% | 1645 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 88 | 240+173% |
| L1 Cache | 2.8 MB+100% | 1.4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+300% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P6000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P6000 has 23 GB. The Quadro P6000 offers 46.5% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 432 GB/s (Quadro P6000) — a 92.9% advantage for the Quadro P6000. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 3 MB (Quadro P6000) — the RTX 2000E Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 23.438 GB+46% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 432 GB/s+93% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+300% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 12.1 (Quadro P6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000).
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 5.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation draws 70W versus the Quadro P6000's 250W — a 112.5% difference. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 650W (Quadro P6000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 167mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-72% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 167mm | 267mm |
| Height | 68mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 217.9+251% | 62.0 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $999, while the Quadro P6000 launched at $5999 and now averages $1500. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation costs 33.4% less ($501 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.3 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 10.3 (Quadro P6000) — the RTX 2000E Ada Generation offers 48.5% better value. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999-83% | $5999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $999-33% | $1500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.3+49% | 10.3 |
| Codename | AD107 | GP102 |
| Release | February 12 2024 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #107 | #141 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 2000E Ada Generation and Quadro P6000
