CPU
GPU
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is significantly newer (2024 vs 2016). The RTX 2000E Ada Generation likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX 2000E Ada Generation offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 2000E Ada Generation and GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,252 points. Launch price was $649.
GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)
The GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 15 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1771 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,614 points. Launch price was $499.99.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation scores 15,252 and the GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) reaches 15,614 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)). Raw compute: 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 9.068 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 2130 MHz vs 1771 MHz.
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,252 | 15,614+2% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816+10% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12 TFLOPS+32% | 9.068 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2130 MHz+20% | 1771 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 88 | 160+82% |
| L1 Cache | 2.8 MB+198% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+500% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) has 8 GB. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 320 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)) — a 42.9% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel). Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)) — the RTX 2000E Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 320 GB/s+43% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 12.0 (GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs NVENC 5.0 (GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)).
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 5.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation draws 70W versus the GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)'s 150W — a 72.7% difference. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 650W (GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 167mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-53% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 167mm | 0mm |
| Height | 68mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 217.9+109% | 104.1 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | RTX 2000E Ada Generation | GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $999 | — |
| Codename | AD107 | GP104 |
| Release | February 12 2024 | August 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #107 | #180 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 2000E Ada Generation and GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)
