
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Arc Graphics 140T

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Arc Graphics 140T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140T
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 351.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140T.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+351.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-351.4%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $280 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140T, it costs 7% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 383.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+383.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($280) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Arc Graphics 140T

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Arc Graphics 140T
The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Arc Graphics 140T's 4,500 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 351.4%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Arc Graphics 140T uses Xe+. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 8 (Arc Graphics 140T). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2350 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+351% | 4,500 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Xe+ |
| Shading Units | 4864+60700% | 8 |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2350 MHz+41% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc Graphics 140T relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 140T has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 8 MB (Arc Graphics 140T) — the Arc Graphics 140T has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140T). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140T). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140T).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Arc Graphics 140T's 35W — a 140.4% difference. The Arc Graphics 140T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 140T). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 35W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6 | 128.6+27% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $280, while the Arc Graphics 140T launched at $350 and now averages $300. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 6.7% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 15.0 (Arc Graphics 140T) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 383.3% better value. The Arc Graphics 140T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $350-12% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $280-7% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 72.5+383% | 15.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | — |
| Release | December 1 2020 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #73 | #409 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











