GeForce RTX 3070 vs Arc Graphics 140T
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Arc Graphics 140T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140T
Why is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Arc Graphics 140T?
The comparison between the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti showcases two of the most popular mid-to-high-end cards from the Ampere generation. The RTX 3070 Ti is a clear step up, offering roughly 15-20% higher performance in most 1440p gaming benchmarks. While both cards are excellent for 1080p and 1440p, the \"Ti\" variant of the 70-series provides the extra push needed to maintain higher frame rates at Ultra settings in more demanding AAA titles.
Technically, both cards feature the Ampere architecture and 8GB of VRAM. However, the RTX 3070 Ti utilizes much faster GDDR6X memory compared to the standard GDDR6 on the 3060 Ti, providing significantly higher bandwidth. The 3070 Ti also has a higher core count and a larger power envelope, allowing it to maintain higher boost clocks during intense gaming sessions. Both cards support DLSS and Ray Tracing perfectly, but the 3070 Ti is the more robust choice for users who want to push their visuals further.
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is the winner for gamers who want a high-end 1440p experience without compromise. It offers better stability in demanding scenes and higher overall throughput. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti remains the winner in terms of pure value, as it provides roughly 85% of the performance for a significantly lower price and power draw. For most users, the 3060 Ti is the more \"sensible\" purchase, but for those who want that extra tier of enthusiast speed, the 3070 Ti is the definitive winner.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 392.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140T.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+392.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-392.7%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140T, it costs 33% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 639.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+639.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($200) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Arc Graphics 140T
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Arc Graphics 140T
The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Arc Graphics 140T's 4,500 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 392.7%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Arc Graphics 140T uses Xe+. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 8 (Arc Graphics 140T). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2350 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+393% | 4,500 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Xe+ |
| Shading Units | 5888+73500% | 8 |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2350 MHz+36% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc Graphics 140T relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 140T has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 8 MB (Arc Graphics 140T) — the Arc Graphics 140T has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140T). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140T). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 140T).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Arc Graphics 140T's 35W — a 145.1% difference. The Arc Graphics 140T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 140T). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 35W-84% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 128.6+28% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Arc Graphics 140T launched at $350 and now averages $300. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 33.3% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 15.0 (Arc Graphics 140T) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 639.3% better value. The Arc Graphics 140T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Arc Graphics 140T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $350-30% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-33% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.9+639% | 15.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | — |
| Release | September 1 2020 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #63 | #409 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3070 and Arc Graphics 140T
