GeForce RTX 3070 vs Arc A310
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Arc A310
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Per Dollar Arc A310
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 307.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A310.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+307.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-307.7%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $200 (vs $100), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 103.9% better value per dollar than the Arc A310.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+103.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Arc A310
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Arc A310
The Arc A310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,438 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Arc A310's 5,438 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 307.7%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Arc A310 uses Generation 12.7, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 768 (Arc A310). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3.072 TFLOPS (Arc A310). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 6 (Arc A310) with 184 Tensor cores vs 96.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+308% | 5,438 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+667% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+561% | 3.072 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2000 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 96+500% | 16 |
| TMUs | 184+475% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+427% | 1.1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+667% | 6 |
| Tensor Cores | 184+92% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A310 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A310 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 124 GB/s (Arc A310) — a 261.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+261% | 124 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A310). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc A310). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc A310).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Arc A310's 75W — a 98.3% difference. The Arc A310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 300W (Arc A310). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 242mm vs 169mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 75W-66% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 300W-54% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 242mm | 169mm |
| Height | 112mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+39% | 72.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Arc A310 launched at $100 and now averages $100. The Arc A310 costs 50% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 54.4 (Arc A310) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 103.9% better value. The Arc A310 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Arc A310 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $100-80% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $100-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.9+104% | 54.4 |
| Codename | GA104 | DG2-128 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | October 12 2022 |
| Ranking | #63 | #422 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3070 and Arc A310
