
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon RX 7900 GRE

GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7900 GRE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 22.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3070.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-22.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+22.5%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (276mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $540 for the Radeon RX 7900 GRE, it costs 63% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 120.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+120.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($200) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($540) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon RX 7900 GRE

GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon RX 7900 GRE
The Radeon RX 7900 GRE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 27 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1287 MHz to 2245 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,162 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon RX 7900 GRE's 27,162 — the Radeon RX 7900 GRE leads by 22.5%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 7900 GRE uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 5,120 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 45.98 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900 GRE). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2245 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 80 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE) with 184 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172 | 27,162+23% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+15% | 5120 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS | 45.98 TFLOPS+126% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2245 MHz+30% |
| ROPs | 96 | 160+67% |
| TMUs | 184 | 320+74% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+132% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 80+74% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7900 GRE is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3070 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7900 GRE relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7900 GRE has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 7900 GRE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900 GRE) — a 28.6% advantage for the Radeon RX 7900 GRE. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900 GRE) — the Radeon RX 7900 GRE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 576 GB/s+29% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7900 GRE). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 7900 GRE).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon RX 7900 GRE's 260W — a 16.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 750W (Radeon RX 7900 GRE). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 276mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 60°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-15% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 276mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 60°C-20% |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 104.5+4% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Radeon RX 7900 GRE launched at $549 and now averages $540. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 63% less ($340 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 50.3 (Radeon RX 7900 GRE) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 120.5% better value. The Radeon RX 7900 GRE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-9% | $549 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-63% | $540 |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.9+120% | 50.3 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 31 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | July 27 2023 |
| Ranking | #63 | #29 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














