
GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon TM R9 A360

GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Radeon TM R9 A360
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3070 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 3070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon TM R9 A360 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 976.3% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon TM R9 A360.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+976.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-976.3%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $200 (vs $20), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 7.6% better value per dollar than the Radeon TM R9 A360.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+7.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon TM R9 A360

GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon TM R9 A360
The Radeon TM R9 A360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,060 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon TM R9 A360's 2,060 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 976.3%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon TM R9 A360 uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 512 (Radeon TM R9 A360). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon TM R9 A360). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+976% | 2,060 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+1050% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+2044% | 0.9472 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+86% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+500% | 16 |
| TMUs | 184+475% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+4362% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon TM R9 A360 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon TM R9 A360 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon TM R9 A360) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12_0 (Radeon TM R9 A360). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon TM R9 A360). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon TM R9 A360's 30W — a 152% difference. The Radeon TM R9 A360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (Radeon TM R9 A360). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 30W-86% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 1mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+47% | 68.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Radeon TM R9 A360 launched at $0 and now averages $20. The Radeon TM R9 A360 costs 90% less ($180 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 103.0 (Radeon TM R9 A360) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 7.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $20-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.9+8% | 103.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | Tropo |
| Release | September 1 2020 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #63 | #711 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














