GeForce RTX 3070 vs RTX PRO 6000
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
RTX PRO 6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 6000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX PRO 6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 93.5% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (48 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3070.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-93.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+93.5%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $8,565 for the RTX PRO 6000, it costs 98% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 2113.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2113.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($200) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($8,565) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and RTX PRO 6000
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
RTX PRO 6000
The RTX PRO 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42,899 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the RTX PRO 6000's 42,899 — the RTX PRO 6000 leads by 93.5%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the RTX PRO 6000 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 24,064 (RTX PRO 6000). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 115.8 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 6000). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2407 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 188 (RTX PRO 6000) with 184 Tensor cores vs 752.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172 | 42,899+93% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 24064+309% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS | 115.8 TFLOPS+470% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2407 MHz+40% |
| ROPs | 96 | 176+83% |
| TMUs | 184 | 752+309% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 23.5 MB+305% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 128 MB+3100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 188+309% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 752+309% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RTX PRO 6000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 6000 has 48 GB. The RTX PRO 6000 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 960 GB/s (RTX PRO 6000) — a 114.3% advantage for the RTX PRO 6000. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 128 MB (RTX PRO 6000) — the RTX PRO 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 48 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 960 GB/s+114% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 128 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 6000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 6000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX PRO 6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the RTX PRO 6000's 600W — a 92.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (RTX PRO 6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-63% | 600W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 304mm |
| Height | 112mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+41% | 71.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the RTX PRO 6000 launched at $8565 and now averages $8565. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 97.7% less ($8365 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 5.0 (RTX PRO 6000) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 2118% better value. The RTX PRO 6000 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-94% | $8565 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-98% | $8565 |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.9+2118% | 5.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | GB202 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | 2025 |
| Ranking | #63 | #608 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3070 and RTX PRO 6000
