CPU
GPU
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (2 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 4000 Ada Generation and GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.
GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,025 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation scores 24,046 and the GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile reaches 23,025 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 5,120 (GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile). Raw compute: 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 15.97 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 40 (GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile) with 192 Tensor cores vs 160.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 24,046+4% | 23,025 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+20% | 5120 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 26.73 TFLOPS+67% | 15.97 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 192+20% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+20% | 5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48+20% | 40 |
| Tensor Cores | 192+20% | 160 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 3.5 (including Frame Gen/Ray Reconstruction), whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is capped at DLSS 2.0.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile) — a 24.4% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile. Bus width: 160-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 ECC | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 360 GB/s | 448 GB/s+24% |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 256-bit+60% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile).
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (3x) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile's 115W — a 48.6% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-39% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 343.5+72% | 200.2 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1547 | — |
| Codename | AD104 | GA104 |
| Release | August 9 2023 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #47 | #164 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 4000 Ada Generation and GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
