RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

NVIDIA

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

2023Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 1560 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

2023Core: 1155 MHzBoost: 2550 MHz

RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

2023

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 70W instead of 175W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 400), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

2023

Why buy it

  • 56.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 108.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (400 vs 192).
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • 150% higher power demand at 175W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 56.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward RTX 4000 Ada Generation instead at 24,046 vs 23,356, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RTX 4000 Ada Generation makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.

NVIDIA

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,356 points.

Graphics Performance

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation scores 24,046 and the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU reaches 23,356 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2550 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 100 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) with 192 Tensor cores vs 400.

FeatureRTX 4000 Ada GenerationRTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
G3D Mark Score
24,046+3%
23,356
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
5 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
6144
12800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)
26.73 TFLOPS
65.28 TFLOPS+144%
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
2550 MHz+63%
ROPs
64
176+175%
TMUs
192
400+108%
L1 Cache
6 MB
12.5 MB+108%
L2 Cache
48 MB
72 MB+50%
Ray Tracing Cores
48
100+108%
Tensor Cores
192
400+108%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both cards support Frame Generation, but the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is on the newer stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation stays on DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

FeatureRTX 4000 Ada GenerationRTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
DLSS 4 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14%
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Yes (DLSS 4)+14%
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 2 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU carries 16 GB. RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — a 60% advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU. Memory bus width is 160-bit on the RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 256-bit on the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU. L2 Cache: 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRTX 4000 Ada GenerationRTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
16 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR6 ECC
GDDR6 ECC
Memory Bandwidth
360 GB/s
576 GB/s+60%
Bus Width
160-bit
256-bit+60%
L2 Cache
48 MB
72 MB+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRTX 4000 Ada GenerationRTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs NVENC 8th gen (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).

FeatureRTX 4000 Ada GenerationRTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC (3x)
NVENC 8th gen
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
NVDEC 5th gen
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation draws 70W versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 175W — a 85.7% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 175W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

FeatureRTX 4000 Ada GenerationRTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
TDP
70W-60%
175W
Recommended PSU
750W
175W-77%
Power Connector
1x 8-pin
Mobile
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80°C
80°C
Perf/Watt
343.5+157%
133.5