CPU
GPU
Radeon PRO W7700
Popular choices:
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7700
Performance Per Dollar RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon PRO W7700 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (2 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon PRO W7700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $999 versus $1,547 for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation, it costs 35% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 48.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+48.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($999) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,547) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7700 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Radeon PRO W7700
The Radeon PRO W7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,062 points. Launch price was $999.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7700 scores 23,062 and the RTX 4000 Ada Generation reaches 24,046 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7700 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 31.95 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 192.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 23,062 | 24,046+4% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 6144+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.95 TFLOPS+20% | 26.73 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz+67% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192 | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 6 MB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7700 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 2 GB. The Radeon PRO W7700 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — a 20% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7700. Bus width: 192-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+700% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s+20% | 360 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+20% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | 8th Gen NVENC (3x) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7700 draws 190W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 92.3% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W | 70W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-27% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 121.4 | 343.5+183% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7700 launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $999, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation launched at $1999 and now averages $1547. The Radeon PRO W7700 costs 35.4% less ($548 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.1 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 15.5 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the Radeon PRO W7700 offers 49% better value.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999-50% | $1999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $999-35% | $1547 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.1+49% | 15.5 |
| Codename | Navi 32 | AD104 |
| Release | November 13 2023 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #52 | #47 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W7700 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation
