Radeon PRO W7700
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Radeon PRO W7700 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon PRO W7700 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon PRO W7700 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon PRO W7700
2023Why buy it
- ✅32.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,000 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 91.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.1 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 190W vs 70W.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 190W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌100.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 23.1 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon PRO W7700 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon PRO W7700
The Radeon PRO W7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,062 points. Launch price was $999.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7700 scores 23,062 and the RTX 4000 Ada Generation reaches 24,046 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7700 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 31.95 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 192.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 23,062 | 24,046+4% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 6144+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.95 TFLOPS+20% | 26.73 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz+67% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 192 | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 6 MB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO W7700 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W7700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7700 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation carries 2 GB. Radeon PRO W7700 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — a 20% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7700. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the Radeon PRO W7700 and 160-bit on the RTX 4000 Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+700% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s+20% | 360 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+20% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | 8th Gen NVENC (3x) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7700 draws 190W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 92.3% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W | 70W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-27% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 121.4 | 343.5+183% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon PRO W7700 came in at $999, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation launched at $1999. On MSRP, Radeon PRO W7700 was 50% cheaper ($1000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 23.1 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 12.0 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the Radeon PRO W7700 offers 92.5% better value.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999-50% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.1+93% | 12.0 |
| Codename | Navi 32 | AD104 |
| Release | November 13 2023 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #52 | #47 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W7700 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation
