CPU
GPU
Radeon PRO W7700
Popular choices:
RTX A5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7700
Performance Per Dollar RTX A5000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W7700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX A5000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon PRO W7700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $999 versus $1,800 for the RTX A5000, it costs 45% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 81.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+81.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($999) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,800) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7700 and RTX A5000
Radeon PRO W7700
The Radeon PRO W7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,062 points. Launch price was $999.
RTX A5000
The RTX A5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,951 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7700 scores 23,062 and the RTX A5000 reaches 22,951 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7700 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX A5000 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 8,192 (RTX A5000). Raw compute: 31.95 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTX A5000). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 64 (RTX A5000) vs 256.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 23,062 | 22,951 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 8192+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.95 TFLOPS+15% | 27.77 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz+53% | 1695 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 192 | 256+33% |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 8 MB+967% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 64+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7700 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A5000 has 24 GB. The RTX A5000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 768 GB/s (RTX A5000) — a 77.8% advantage for the RTX A5000. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 6 MB (RTX A5000) — the RTX A5000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 24 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 768 GB/s+78% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 12.1 (RTX A5000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A5000). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A5000).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7700 draws 190W versus the RTX A5000's 230W — a 19% difference. The Radeon PRO W7700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 650W (RTX A5000). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W-17% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 121.4+22% | 99.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7700 launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $999, while the RTX A5000 launched at $3721 and now averages $1800. The Radeon PRO W7700 costs 44.5% less ($801 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.1 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 12.8 (RTX A5000) — the Radeon PRO W7700 offers 80.5% better value. The Radeon PRO W7700 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999-73% | $3721 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $999-45% | $1800 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.1+80% | 12.8 |
| Codename | Navi 32 | GA102 |
| Release | November 13 2023 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #52 | #53 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W7700 and RTX A5000
