Radeon PRO W7700 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
Radeon PRO W7700
Popular choices:
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7700
Performance Per Dollar RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W7700.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7700 and RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
Radeon PRO W7700
The Radeon PRO W7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,062 points. Launch price was $999.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1425 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,379 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7700 scores 23,062 and the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile reaches 23,379 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7700 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 9,728 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 31.95 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 41.15 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 1575 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 76 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 304.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 23,062 | 23,379+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 9728+217% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.95 TFLOPS | 41.15 TFLOPS+29% |
| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz+65% | 1575 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 112+17% |
| TMUs | 192 | 304+58% |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 9.5 MB+1167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 64 MB+3100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 76+58% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 16 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 33.3% advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 64 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 576 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 64 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs NVENC 8th gen (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7700 draws 190W versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile's 115W — a 49.2% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 175W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W | 115W-39% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 175W-68% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 121.4 | 203.3+67% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W7700 and RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
