Radeon PRO W7700 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon PRO W7700 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon PRO W7700 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon PRO W7700

2023

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌65.2% higher power demand at 190W vs 115W.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅21.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 115W instead of 190W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 21.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (23,379 vs 23,062), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 76 vs 48 ray-tracing units. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon PRO W7700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and strong 1440p, Radeon PRO W7700 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and strong 1440p headroom, RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon PRO W7700 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon PRO W7700

The Radeon PRO W7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,062 points. Launch price was $999.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1425 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,379 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon PRO W7700 scores 23,062 and the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile reaches 23,379 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7700 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 9,728 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 31.95 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 41.15 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 1575 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 76 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 304.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7700	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
G3D Mark Score	23,062	23,379+1%
Architecture	RDNA 3.0	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	5 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	3072	9728+217%
Compute (TFLOPS)	31.95 TFLOPS	41.15 TFLOPS+29%
Boost Clock	2600 MHz+65%	1575 MHz
ROPs	96	112+17%
TMUs	192	304+58%
L1 Cache	0.75 MB	9.5 MB+1167%
L2 Cache	2 MB	64 MB+3100%
Ray Tracing Cores	48	76+58%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO W7700 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W7700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7700	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	DLSS 4 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 4)
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 16 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 33.3% advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the Radeon PRO W7700 and 256-bit on the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 64 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7700	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
VRAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	432 GB/s	576 GB/s+33%
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB	64 MB+3100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7700	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs NVENC 8th gen (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile).

Feature	Radeon PRO W7700	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
Encoder	VCN 4.0	NVENC 8th gen
Decoder	VCN 4.0	NVDEC 5th gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO W7700 draws 190W versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile's 115W — a 49.2% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 175W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7700	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
TDP	190W	115W-39%
Recommended PSU	550W	175W-68%
Power Connector	1x 8-pin	Mobile
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	121.4	203.3+67%