Radeon PRO W7700
RTX A6000
Radeon PRO W7700 vs RTX A6000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon PRO W7700 vs RTX A6000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon PRO W7700 vs RTX A6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon PRO W7700
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,650 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 370.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.1 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 190W instead of 230W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
RTX A6000
2021Why buy it
- ✅15.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 16 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Radeon PRO W7700 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌365.4% HIGHER MSRP$4,649 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 23.1 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ❌21.1% higher power demand at 230W vs 190W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon PRO W7700 vs RTX A6000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon PRO W7700
The Radeon PRO W7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,062 points. Launch price was $999.
RTX A6000
The RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,815 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7700 scores 23,062 and the RTX A6000 reaches 22,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7700 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX A6000 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 8,192 (RTX A6000). Raw compute: 31.95 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTX A6000). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 64 (RTX A6000) vs 256.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 23,062+1% | 22,815 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 8192+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.95 TFLOPS+15% | 27.77 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz+53% | 1695 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 192 | 256+33% |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 8 MB+967% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 64+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A6000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W7700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7700 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A6000 carries 48 GB. RTX A6000 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 768 GB/s (RTX A6000) — a 77.8% advantage for the RTX A6000. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the Radeon PRO W7700 and 384-bit on the RTX A6000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 6 MB (RTX A6000) — the RTX A6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 48 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 768 GB/s+78% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 12.1 (RTX A6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A6000). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A6000).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7700 draws 190W versus the RTX A6000's 230W — a 19% difference. The Radeon PRO W7700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 500W (RTX A6000). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 8-pin EPS. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W-17% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | 8-pin EPS |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 121.4+22% | 99.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon PRO W7700 came in at $999, while the RTX A6000 launched at $4649. On MSRP, Radeon PRO W7700 was 78.5% cheaper ($3650 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 23.1 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 4.9 (RTX A6000) — the Radeon PRO W7700 offers 371.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W7700 (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999-79% | $4649 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.1+371% | 4.9 |
| Codename | Navi 32 | GA102 |
| Release | November 13 2023 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #52 | #53 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W7700 and RTX A6000
