
Radeon PRO W7700

Radeon RX 9070 GRE
Radeon PRO W7700 vs Radeon RX 9070 GRE Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon PRO W7700 vs Radeon RX 9070 GRE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon PRO W7700 vs Radeon RX 9070 GRE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon PRO W7700
2023Why buy it
- ✅18.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 190W instead of 220W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ❌Radeon RX 9070 GRE is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌73.7% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$575 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.1 vs 42.5 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $575 MSRP).
Radeon RX 9070 GRE
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $424 less on MSRP ($575 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 84% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 42.5 vs 23.1 G3D/$ ($575 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 (2025).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌15.8% higher power demand at 220W vs 190W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon PRO W7700 vs Radeon RX 9070 GRE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon PRO W7700
The Radeon PRO W7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,062 points. Launch price was $999.

Radeon RX 9070 GRE
The Radeon RX 9070 GRE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 8 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1420 MHz to 2790 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,418 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon PRO W7700 scores 23,062 versus the Radeon RX 9070 GRE's 24,418 — the Radeon RX 9070 GRE leads by 5.9%. The Radeon PRO W7700 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon RX 9070 GRE uses RDNA 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 3,072 (Radeon RX 9070 GRE). Raw compute: 31.95 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 34.28 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 9070 GRE). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 2790 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 48 (Radeon RX 9070 GRE) vs 96.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 23,062 | 24,418+6% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.95 TFLOPS | 34.28 TFLOPS+7% |
| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz | 2790 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 192 | 192 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR Upscaling + Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 9070 GRE is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO W7700 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7700 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 9070 GRE carries 12 GB. Radeon PRO W7700 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the Radeon PRO W7700 and 192-bit on the Radeon RX 9070 GRE. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 8 MB (Radeon RX 9070 GRE) — the Radeon RX 9070 GRE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 9070 GRE). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 9070 GRE). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (Radeon RX 9070 GRE).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7700 draws 190W versus the Radeon RX 9070 GRE's 220W — a 14.6% difference. The Radeon PRO W7700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 650W (Radeon RX 9070 GRE). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W-14% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 280mm |
| Height | 111mm | 127mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 121.4+9% | 111.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon PRO W7700 came in at $999, while the Radeon RX 9070 GRE launched at $575. On MSRP, Radeon RX 9070 GRE was 42.4% cheaper ($424 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 23.1 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 42.5 (Radeon RX 9070 GRE) — the Radeon RX 9070 GRE offers 84% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 9070 GRE (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7700 | Radeon RX 9070 GRE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $575-42% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.1 | 42.5+84% |
| Codename | Navi 32 | Navi 48 |
| Release | November 13 2023 | May 8 2025 |
| Ranking | #52 | #44 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














