
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 140W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 280), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 13.3 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅58.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 10.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.3 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅45.8% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (280 vs 192).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 140W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1230 MHz to 2055 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,498 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation scores 24,046 versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell's 26,498 — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell leads by 10.2%. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 36.83 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2055 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 70 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) with 192 Tensor cores vs 280.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 24,046 | 26,498+10% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144 | 8960+46% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 26.73 TFLOPS | 36.83 TFLOPS+38% |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2055 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 192 | 280+46% |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB | 8.8 MB+47% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 70+46% |
| Tensor Cores | 192 | 280+46% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 2 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell carries 24 GB. RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 432 GB/s (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — a 20% advantage for the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell. Memory bus width is 160-bit on the RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 192-bit on the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 24 GB+1100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 ECC | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 360 GB/s | 432 GB/s+20% |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 192-bit+20% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell).
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (3x) | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation draws 70W versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell's 140W — a 66.7% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-50% | 140W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 343.5+81% | 189.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation came in at $1999, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell launched at $1999. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.0 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 13.3 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell offers 10.8% better value. The newer card here is RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.0 | 13.3+11% |
| Codename | AD104 | GB203 |
| Release | August 9 2023 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #47 | #48 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














