RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

2023

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 70W instead of 115W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 304), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅60.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅58.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (304 vs 192).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
❌64.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 60.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward RTX 4000 Ada Generation instead at 24,046 vs 23,379, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RTX 4000 Ada Generation makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1425 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,379 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation scores 24,046 and the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile reaches 23,379 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 9,728 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 41.15 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1575 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 76 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) with 192 Tensor cores vs 304.

Feature	RTX 4000 Ada Generation	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
G3D Mark Score	24,046+3%	23,379
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	5 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	6144	9728+58%
Compute (TFLOPS)	26.73 TFLOPS	41.15 TFLOPS+54%
Boost Clock	1560 MHz	1575 MHz
ROPs	64	112+75%
TMUs	192	304+58%
L1 Cache	6 MB	9.5 MB+58%
L2 Cache	48 MB	64 MB+33%
Ray Tracing Cores	48	76+58%
Tensor Cores	192	304+58%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both cards support Frame Generation, but the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is on the newer stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation stays on DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

Feature	RTX 4000 Ada Generation	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	DLSS 4 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14%
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	Yes (DLSS 4)+14%
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 2 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile carries 16 GB. RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 60% advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile. Memory bus width is 160-bit on the RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 256-bit on the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile. L2 Cache: 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 64 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RTX 4000 Ada Generation	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	16 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR6 ECC	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	360 GB/s	576 GB/s+60%
Bus Width	160-bit	256-bit+60%
L2 Cache	48 MB	64 MB+33%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	RTX 4000 Ada Generation	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs NVENC 8th gen (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile).

Feature	RTX 4000 Ada Generation	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (3x)	NVENC 8th gen
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	NVDEC 5th gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation draws 70W versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile's 115W — a 48.6% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 175W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	RTX 4000 Ada Generation	RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
TDP	70W-39%	115W
Recommended PSU	750W	175W-77%
Power Connector	1x 8-pin	Mobile
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	343.5+69%	203.3