GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance Per Dollar MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M?
Comparing the enthusiast GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB to the legacy mobile flagship GeForce GTX 675M highlights over a decade of astronomical GPU progress. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is roughly 3000% faster, representing the jump from the absolute height of 2012 notebook power to a modern desktop powerhouse that masters 1440p Ultra with high refresh rates and cinematic graphics.
Technically, the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB wins on absolute architectural scale, featuring a massive 16GB VRAM buffer and next-gen specialized cores for Ray Tracing and DLSS 3 support. The GeForce GTX 675M is based on a legacy architecture and lacks the core count or features to handle modern high-fidelity textures with any stability. Moving from any notebook with legacy graphics to a 40-series discrete desktop is a life-changing improvement, providing the speed and visual depth needed for professional creative work in 2026.
There is no contest here; the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the absolute winner. it provides a level of depth and speed that turns the most demanding games into fluid, cinematic experiences. The GeForce GTX 675M is now strictly for entry-level use on legacy systems. if you are looking to revitalize your PC experience with a performance boost that is truly world-class, the 16 GB 40-series card is the definitive and superior choice.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2012). The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 759% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+759%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-759%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M's 2,637 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 759%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+759% | 2,637 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+1033% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+2216% | 0.9523 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 136+113% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+760% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+6300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+6300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 11.0 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+11% | 11.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+10% | 4.2 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs PureVideo HD (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | PureVideo HD |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VP4 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M's 100W — a 46.2% difference. The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 100W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+436% | 26.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | — |
| Codename | AD106 | GF114 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | March 22 2012 |
| Ranking | #59 | #704 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
