GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
VS
Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2535 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

2018Core: 931 MHzBoost: 1011 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
110%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
108%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
108%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
107%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
106%
#17
Radeon RX 6700
MSRP: $379|Avg: $300
106%
#18
Radeon RX 6600 XT
MSRP: $379|Avg: $170
104%
#19
Radeon RX590 GME
MSRP: $173|Avg: $115
104%
#20
Radeon RX 6650 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $230
103%
#21
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
101%
#22
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP: $169|Avg: $179
101%
#23
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
MSRP: $249|Avg: $209
101%
#24
Radeon RX 6600 LE
MSRP: $329|Avg: $160
100%
#25
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
100%
#26
Radeon RX 7700 XT
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
100%
#27
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $380
100%
#28
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
MSRP: $269|Avg: $318
99%
#29
Radeon RX 6700 XT
MSRP: $479|Avg: $230
99%
#30
GeForce RTX 3060
MSRP: $329|Avg: $289
99%
#31
Radeon RX 7400
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
98%
#32
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
98%
#33
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
96%
#34
Radeon RX 5300
MSRP: $129|Avg: $50
94%
#35
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
MSRP: $150|Avg: $77
93%
#36
Radeon RX 6400
MSRP: $159|Avg: $139
93%
#37
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
MSRP: $599|Avg: $330
93%
#38
Arc A750
MSRP: $289|Avg: $229
92%
#39
Radeon RX 6800
MSRP: $579|Avg: $370
91%
#40
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $280
91%
#41
Radeon RX 6750 XT
MSRP: $549|Avg: $320
90%
#42
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
MSRP: $799|Avg: $590
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

#196
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
415%
#198
376%
#199
375%
#203
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
341%
#204
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
339%
#206
Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#208
Radeon RX Vega M GL
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#212
GeForce GTX 780M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60
98%
#216
Radeon 8040S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
93%
#217
Radeon R7 +8G
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
93%
#221
Radeon HD 6550A
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 477.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870.

InsightGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Performance
Leading raw performance (+477.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-477.5%)
Longevity
🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Vega (2017−2020))
Ecosystem
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $380 (vs $150), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 128% better value per dollar than the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870.

InsightGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+128%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380)
More affordable ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

The Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2018. It features the Vega architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,922 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870's 3,922 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 477.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 uses Vega, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1,280 (Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1011 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon RX Vega M GL / 870
G3D Mark Score
22,651+478%
3,922
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Vega
Process Node
5 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
4352+240%
1280
Boost Clock
2535 MHz+151%
1011 MHz

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.0 (Native)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 179.2 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870) — a 60.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 1024-bit.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon RX Vega M GL / 870
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR6
HBM2
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s+61%
179.2 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
1024-bit+700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon RX Vega M GL / 870
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
6+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC
VCE 3.0
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
UVD 6.3
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870's 65W — a 84.4% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon RX Vega M GL / 870
TDP
160W
65W-59%
Recommended PSU
550W
1W-100%
Power Connector
8-pin
Integrated
Length
240mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70°C-13%
80
Perf/Watt
141.6+135%
60.3
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $380, while the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 launched at $150 and now averages $150. The Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 costs 60.5% less ($230 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 59.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 26.1 (Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 128.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRadeon RX Vega M GL / 870
MSRP
$399
$150-62%
Avg Price (30d)
$380
$150-61%
Performance per Dollar
59.6+128%
26.1
Codename
AD106
Vega Kaby Lake-G
Release
May 18 2023
January 7 2018
Ranking
#59
#427