GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs RADEON X600 PRO
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
RADEON X600 PRO
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X600 PRO
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33707.5% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X600 PRO.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+33707.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-33707.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $380 (vs $10), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 789.7% better value per dollar than the RADEON X600 PRO.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+789.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and RADEON X600 PRO
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
RADEON X600 PRO
The RADEON X600 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the RADEON X600 PRO's 67 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 33707.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RADEON X600 PRO uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,048 (RADEON X600 PRO). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (RADEON X600 PRO). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+33707% | 67 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+113% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+245% | 6.39 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+63% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136+6% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+967% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RADEON X600 PRO lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RADEON X600 PRO relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON X600 PRO has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3 MB (RADEON X600 PRO) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+1500% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+967% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs None (RADEON X600 PRO). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs MPEG-2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9 (RADEON X600 PRO).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | None |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | MPEG-2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the RADEON X600 PRO's 150W — a 6.5% difference. The RADEON X600 PRO is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (RADEON X600 PRO). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Legacy. Card length: 240mm vs 170mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 150W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Legacy |
| Length | 240mm | 170mm |
| Height | 111mm | 65mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+35300% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $380, while the RADEON X600 PRO launched at $99 and now averages $10. The RADEON X600 PRO costs 97.4% less ($370 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 59.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 6.7 (RADEON X600 PRO) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 789.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $99-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | $10-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.6+790% | 6.7 |
| Codename | AD106 | Navi 10 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | January 21 2020 |
| Ranking | #59 | #216 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and RADEON X600 PRO
