GeForce RTX 4060 vs GeForce MX330
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
GeForce MX330
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX330
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 better than GeForce MX330?
Comparing the ultra-mobile GeForce MX330 to the powerhouse GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB reveals an astronomical difference in performance. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is roughly 1500-2000% more powerful, transforming unplayable e-sports tasks into world-class 1440p Ultra gaming. This is a matchup between a basic laptop accelerator and a dedicated enthusiast-grade desktop GPU.
The architectural gap is monumental. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB features a massive 16GB of VRAM and specialized hardware for Ray Tracing and DLSS 3 Frame Generation. The MX330 features only 2GB of low-speed memory and lacks the core counts or feature support to run modern AAA titles. Moving from an MX330-based laptop to an RTX 4060 Ti desktop is a life-changing improvement, providing the speed and visual fidelity needed for high-end rendering and professional creative work in 2026.
There is no contest; the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the absolute winner. it provides a level of immersion and speed that turns the most demanding games into fluid, cinematic experiences. The GeForce MX330 is strictly for basic productivity on legacy portable machines and offers no modern gaming capability. If you are looking to revitalize your digital environment with a world-class performance boost, the 16GB 40-series card is the definitive choice for enthusiasts.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 731.8% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX330.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+731.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-731.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $299 (vs $100), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 178.2% better value per dollar than the GeForce MX330.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+178.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($299) | ✅More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and GeForce MX330
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
GeForce MX330
The GeForce MX330 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1531 MHz to 1594 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,350 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the GeForce MX330's 2,350 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 731.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce MX330 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 384 (GeForce MX330). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1.224 TFLOPS (GeForce MX330). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1594 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+732% | 2,350 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+700% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+1134% | 1.224 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+54% | 1594 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+300% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+2043% | 0.14 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+4700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce MX330 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce MX330 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX330 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 48 GB/s (GeForce MX330) — a 466.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce MX330) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s+467% | 48 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+4700% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (GeForce MX330). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs Pascal (GeForce MX330). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce MX330).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | Pascal |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the GeForce MX330's 10W — a 168% difference. The GeForce MX330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (GeForce MX330). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 10W-91% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0 | 235.0+38% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $299, while the GeForce MX330 launched at $150 and now averages $100. The GeForce MX330 costs 66.6% less ($199 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 23.5 (GeForce MX330) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 178.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $150-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $299 | $100-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+178% | 23.5 |
| Codename | AD107 | GP108 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | February 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #84 | #647 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 and GeForce MX330
