GeForce RTX 3070 vs GeForce MX330
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
GeForce MX330
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX330
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 843.5% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX330.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+843.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-843.5%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $200 (vs $100), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 371.7% better value per dollar than the GeForce MX330.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+371.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and GeForce MX330
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
GeForce MX330
The GeForce MX330 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1531 MHz to 1594 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,350 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the GeForce MX330's 2,350 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 843.5%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the GeForce MX330 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 384 (GeForce MX330). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1.224 TFLOPS (GeForce MX330). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1594 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+843% | 2,350 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+1433% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+1559% | 1.224 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+8% | 1594 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+500% | 16 |
| TMUs | 184+667% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+4043% | 0.14 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce MX330 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX330 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 48 GB/s (GeForce MX330) — a 833.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce MX330) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+833% | 48 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 (GeForce MX330). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs Pascal (GeForce MX330). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce MX330).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | Pascal |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the GeForce MX330's 10W — a 182.6% difference. The GeForce MX330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (GeForce MX330). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 10W-95% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 235.0+133% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the GeForce MX330 launched at $150 and now averages $100. The GeForce MX330 costs 50% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 23.5 (GeForce MX330) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 371.9% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $150-70% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $100-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 110.9+372% | 23.5 |
| Codename | GA104 | GP108 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | February 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #63 | #647 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3070 and GeForce MX330
