
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Arc B570

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:

Arc B570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Per Dollar Arc B570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 124.6% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc B570.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+124.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-124.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | Standard Size (249mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Arc B570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $219 versus $590 for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, it costs 63% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 20% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+20%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) | ✅More affordable ($219) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Arc B570

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Arc B570
The Arc B570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 16 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,060 points. Launch price was $219.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Arc B570's 14,060 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 124.6%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Arc B570 uses Xe2, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2,304 (Arc B570). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 11.52 TFLOPS (Arc B570). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2500 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 18 (Arc B570) with 240 Tensor cores vs 144.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+125% | 14,060 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+233% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+248% | 11.52 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+4% | 2500 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 80 |
| TMUs | 240+67% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+67% | 4.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+167% | 18 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60+233% | 18 |
| Tensor Cores | 240+67% | 144 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc B570 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc B570 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Arc B570 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 380 GB/s (Arc B570) — a 32.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 18 MB (Arc B570) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+33% | 380 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+20% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+167% | 18 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc B570). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs Intel Xe Media (Arc B570). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs Intel Xe Media. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc B570).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | Intel Xe Media |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | Intel Xe Media |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Arc B570's 150W — a 62.1% difference. The Arc B570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 600W (Arc B570). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 285mm vs 249mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 150W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 600W-14% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 285mm | 249mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+18% | 93.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $590, while the Arc B570 launched at $219 and now averages $219. The Arc B570 costs 62.9% less ($371 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 64.2 (Arc B570) — the Arc B570 offers 20% better value. The Arc B570 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $219-73% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $590 | $219-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.5 | 64.2+20% |
| Codename | AD104 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | January 16 2025 |
| Ranking | #11 | #169 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














