GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs GeForce FX Go 5600
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
GeForce FX Go 5600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX Go 5600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2011). The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce FX Go 5600 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 175333.3% higher G3D Mark score and 38609.7% more VRAM (12 GB vs 32 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX Go 5600.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce FX Go 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+175333.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-175333.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and GeForce FX Go 5600
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
GeForce FX Go 5600
The GeForce FX Go 5600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the GeForce FX Go 5600's 18 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 175333.3%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce FX Go 5600 uses Rankine, both on 4 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 336 (GeForce FX Go 5600). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go 5600).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce FX Go 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+175333% | 18 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Rankine |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+2186% | 336 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+3581% | 1.089 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240+329% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+1605% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+9500% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce FX Go 5600 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce FX Go 5600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce FX Go 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX Go 5600 has 32 MB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 38609.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce FX Go 5600) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce FX Go 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+38610% | 0.031 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+9500% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX Go 5600). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce FX Go 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+33% | 9.0a |
| OpenGL | 4.6+119% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VPE 3.0 (GeForce FX Go 5600). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VPE 3.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce FX Go 5600).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce FX Go 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | VPE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | VPE 3.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the GeForce FX Go 5600's 150W — a 62.1% difference. The GeForce FX Go 5600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce FX Go 5600). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce FX Go 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 150W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 350W-50% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Legacy |
| Length | 285mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+110700% | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce FX Go 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $590 | — |
| Codename | AD104 | GF114 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | May 17 2011 |
| Ranking | #11 | #605 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and GeForce FX Go 5600
