GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs GeForce G102M
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
GeForce G102M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Per Dollar GeForce G102M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce G102M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 18696.4% higher G3D Mark score and 2300% more VRAM (12 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce G102M.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce G102M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+18696.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-18696.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and GeForce G102M
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
GeForce G102M
The GeForce G102M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 168 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the GeForce G102M's 168 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 18696.4%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce G102M uses Maxwell, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 384 (GeForce G102M). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce G102M). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1176 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce G102M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+18696% | 168 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+1900% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+4339% | 0.9032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+122% | 1176 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+900% | 8 |
| TMUs | 240+900% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+3847% | 0.19 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+4700% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce G102M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce G102M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce G102M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce G102M has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 2300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1 MB (GeForce G102M) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce G102M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+2300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+4700% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 10.0 (GeForce G102M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce G102M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+20% | 10.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | None |
| OpenGL | 4.6+15% | 4.0 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs No (GeForce G102M). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce G102M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce G102M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | No |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | PureVideo HD VP3 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the GeForce G102M's 33W — a 158.5% difference. The GeForce G102M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce G102M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Legacy. Card length: 285mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce G102M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 33W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 350W-50% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Legacy |
| Length | 285mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+2073% | 5.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GeForce G102M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $590 | — |
| Codename | AD104 | GM108 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #11 | #847 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and GeForce G102M
