GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
VS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2610 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design

2020Core: 930 MHzBoost: 1155 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

#27
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $380
111%
#28
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
MSRP: $269|Avg: $318
110%
#29
Radeon RX 6700 XT
MSRP: $479|Avg: $230
110%
#30
GeForce RTX 3060
MSRP: $329|Avg: $289
110%
#31
Radeon RX 7400
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
109%
#32
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
109%
#33
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
107%
#34
Radeon RX 5300
MSRP: $129|Avg: $50
105%
#35
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
MSRP: $150|Avg: $77
104%
#36
Radeon RX 6400
MSRP: $159|Avg: $139
104%
#37
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
MSRP: $599|Avg: $330
104%
#38
Arc A750
MSRP: $289|Avg: $229
103%
#39
Radeon RX 6800
MSRP: $579|Avg: $370
102%
#40
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $280
101%
#41
Radeon RX 6750 XT
MSRP: $549|Avg: $320
101%
#42
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
MSRP: $799|Avg: $590
100%
#43
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
99%
#44
GeForce RTX 5070
MSRP: $549|Avg: $550
98%
#45
Radeon RX 7600 XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
98%
#46
GeForce RTX 2050
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
96%
#47
GeForce RTX 3080
MSRP: $699|Avg: $400
96%
#48
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
MSRP: $499|Avg: $449
95%
#49
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
MSRP: $549|Avg: $540
94%
#50
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
MSRP: $599|Avg: $600
93%
#51
Radeon RX 7800 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $490
92%
#52
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $340
92%
#53
GeForce RTX 4070
MSRP: $599|Avg: $550
91%
#54
Radeon RX 7650 GRE
MSRP: $279|Avg: $380
91%
#55
GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
MSRP: $470|Avg: $120
90%
#56
Arc A770
MSRP: $349|Avg: $280
89%
#57
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
MSRP: $289|Avg: $423
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design

#28
Radeon RX 6650M XT
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
127%
#30
Radeon 8050S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
121%
#31
Radeon RX 8050S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
120%
#39
Radeon RX 7700S
MSRP: $449|Avg: $350
103%
#42
Radeon RX 6600S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#43
Radeon RX 8060S
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
95%
#47
Radeon RX 6700S
MSRP: $479|Avg: $300
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 134.9% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design.

InsightGeForce RTX 4070 TiGeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
Performance
Leading raw performance (+134.9%)
Lower raw frame rates (-134.9%)
Longevity
🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm)
🔮Strong Longevity (Turing (2018−2022) / 12nm)
Ecosystem
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (12 GB)
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (285mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,444 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design's 13,444 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 134.9%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 4 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 5.914 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1155 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 40 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) with 240 Tensor cores vs 320.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 TiGeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score
31,578+135%
13,444
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Turing
Process Node
4 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
7680+200%
2560
Compute (TFLOPS)
40.09 TFLOPS+578%
5.914 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2610 MHz+126%
1155 MHz
ROPs
80+25%
64
TMUs
240+50%
160
L1 Cache
7.5 MB+200%
2.5 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB+1100%
4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
60+50%
40
Tensor Cores
240
320+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 (including Frame Gen/Ray Reconstruction), whereas the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is capped at DLSS 2.0.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 TiGeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5
DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.0 (Native)
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 352 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) — a 43.2% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 TiGeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity
12 GB+50%
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6X
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
504 GB/s+43%
352 GB/s
Bus Width
192-bit
256-bit+33%
L2 Cache
48 MB+1100%
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 TiGeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 TiGeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
Encoder
NVENC (8th Gen)
NVENC 7th Gen
Decoder
NVDEC (5th Gen)
NVDEC 4th Gen
Codecs
AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design's 80W — a 112.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 TiGeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
TDP
285W
80W-72%
Recommended PSU
700W
500W-29%
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
285mm
0mm
Height
112mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70°C-7%
75
Perf/Watt
110.8
168.1+52%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070 TiGeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
MSRP
$799
Avg Price (30d)
$590
Codename
AD104
TU104
Release
January 3 2023
April 2 2020
Ranking
#11
#188