GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Quadro P3200
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Quadro P3200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 268.1% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P3200.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+268.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-268.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P3200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $63 versus $590 for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, it costs 89% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 154.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+154.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) | ✅More affordable ($63) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Quadro P3200
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Quadro P3200
The Quadro P3200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1328 MHz to 1543 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,578 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Quadro P3200's 8,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 268.1%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro P3200 uses Pascal, both on 4 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1,792 (Quadro P3200). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1543 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+268% | 8,578 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+329% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+625% | 5.53 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+69% | 1543 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+114% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+1036% | 0.66 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+3100% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P3200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P3200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P3200 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+3100% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12 (Quadro P3200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P3200). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs H.265,H.264 (Quadro P3200).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | NVDEC 3rd Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Quadro P3200's 75W — a 116.7% difference. The Quadro P3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 500W (Quadro P3200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 75W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 500W-29% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8 | 114.4+3% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $590, while the Quadro P3200 launched at $500 and now averages $63. The Quadro P3200 costs 89.3% less ($527 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 136.2 (Quadro P3200) — the Quadro P3200 offers 154.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $500-37% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $590 | $63-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.5 | 136.2+155% |
| Codename | AD104 | GP104 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #11 | #304 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Quadro P3200
