GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Radeon 860M
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Radeon 860M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 860M
Why is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon 860M?
The matchup between the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and the Radeon 860M demonstrates the gap between high-end desktop leadership and the next generation of integrated graphics. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a 2024 desktop beast with 16GB of VRAM and elite 4K gaming capabilities. The Radeon 860M is a 2025 RDNA 3.5 iGPU (Krackan Point) designed for high-efficiency mobile performance.\n\nIn terms of raw power, the desktop RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is in a completely separate league, typically delivering 8 to 10 times more practical throughput due to its dedicated high-speed GDDR6X memory and massive core count. While the Radeon 860M is exceptionally powerful for integrated graphics—offering a respectable 1080p experience on low-power portables—it cannot match the rendering speed of a flagship-tier dedicated GPU. The 4070 Ti SUPER allows for high-fidelity Ray Tracing and 4K textures that would be entirely out of reach for any integrated solution.\n\nUltimately, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the definitive choice for enthusiasts seeking a premium performance experience. The Radeon 860M is a revolutionary solution for mobile users who value portability and battery life above all else, but for any level of high-end rendering or serious gaming, the 40-series flagship provides a level of fidelity and speed that integrated chips simply cannot match.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 552.7% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (12 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 860M.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+552.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-552.7%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon 860M
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Radeon 860M
The Radeon 860M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Marchar 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 3000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,838 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon 860M's 4,838 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 552.7%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon 860M uses RDNA 3.5, both on a 4 nm process. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 512 (Radeon 860M). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 3.072 TFLOPS (Radeon 860M). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 3000 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 8 (Radeon 860M) with 240 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+553% | 4,838 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+1400% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+1205% | 3.072 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz | 3000 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 80+900% | 8 |
| TMUs | 240+650% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+12400% | 0.06 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+4700% | 1 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60+650% | 8 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon 860M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 860M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 860M has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1 MB (Radeon 860M) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+4700% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon 860M's 15W — a 180% difference. The Radeon 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon 860M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 15W-95% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 350W-50% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8 | 322.5+191% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 860M is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $590 | — |
| Codename | AD104 | Krackan Point |
| Release | January 3 2023 | Marchar 2025 |
| Ranking | #11 | #449 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon 860M
