GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Radeon RX 7700
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 7700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7700
Why is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon RX 7700?
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a clear tier above the AMD Radeon RX 7700, providing approximately 40-50% better performance on average. Built on the 5nm Ada Lovelace architecture, the 4070 Ti SUPER is designed for 4K gaming, whereas the Radeon RX 7700 is primarily a high-performance 1440p solution.
Technically, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER features 16GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, offering 672 GB/s of bandwidth—vastly superior to the 12GB GDDR6 and 192-bit bus found on the RX 7700. Additionally, the NVIDIA card delivers significantly better Ray Tracing performance and support for DLSS 3 with Frame Generation, while the AMD card relies on FSR 3 and its own AI accelerators to bridge the gap.
For enthusiasts aiming for 4K ultra settings or the highest possible fidelity in RT titles, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the definitive winner. The Radeon RX 7700 remains an excellent mid-range value choice for 1440p gaming, but it lacks the raw power and bandwidth to compete with a high-end card like the 4070 Ti SUPER.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 42.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 7700 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+42.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-42.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $399 versus $590 for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, it costs 32% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 3.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) | ✅More affordable ($399) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon RX 7700
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Radeon RX 7700
The Radeon RX 7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,146 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon RX 7700's 22,146 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 42.6%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7700 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7700). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 20.48 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7700). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 32 (Radeon RX 7700) with 240 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+43% | 22,146 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+275% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+96% | 20.48 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+88% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+1400% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+2300% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60+88% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses DLSS 3 (AI-based) which is hardware-accelerated on Tensor Cores, often providing superior image quality. The Radeon RX 7700 utilizes FSR 3 & AFMF, which is more open but driver-based. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7700 has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 7700 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 624 GB/s (Radeon RX 7700) — a 23.8% advantage for the Radeon RX 7700. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7700) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 624 GB/s+24% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+2300% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7700). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon RX 7700's 190W — a 40% difference. The Radeon RX 7700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 650W (Radeon RX 7700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 285mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 190W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 650W-7% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 285mm | 240mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8 | 116.6+5% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $590, while the Radeon RX 7700 launched at $449 and now averages $399. The Radeon RX 7700 costs 32.4% less ($191 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 55.5 (Radeon RX 7700) — the Radeon RX 7700 offers 3.7% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon RX 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $449-44% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $590 | $399-32% |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.5 | 55.5+4% |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 33 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | January 4 2023 |
| Ranking | #11 | #140 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon RX 7700
