GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs RADEON X800 GT
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
RADEON X800 GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800 GT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 37492.9% higher G3D Mark score and 4700% more VRAM (12 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X800 GT.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RADEON X800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+37492.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-37492.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $590 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 855.8% better value per dollar than the RADEON X800 GT.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RADEON X800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+855.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and RADEON X800 GT
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
RADEON X800 GT
The RADEON X800 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 84 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the RADEON X800 GT's 84 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 37492.9%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RADEON X800 GT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4,608 (RADEON X800 GT). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 20.74 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 GT). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2250 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 72 (RADEON X800 GT) with 240 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RADEON X800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+37493% | 84 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+67% | 4608 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+93% | 20.74 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+16% | 2250 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 128+60% |
| TMUs | 240 | 288+20% |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+650% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | 72+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RADEON X800 GT lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RADEON X800 GT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RADEON X800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON X800 GT has 256 MB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 4700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4 MB (RADEON X800 GT) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RADEON X800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+4700% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the RADEON X800 GT's 300W — a 5.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 350W (RADEON X800 GT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RADEON X800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W-5% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 350W-50% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Legacy |
| Length | 285mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+36833% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $590, while the RADEON X800 GT launched at $249 and now averages $15. The RADEON X800 GT costs 97.5% less ($575 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 5.6 (RADEON X800 GT) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 855.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RADEON X800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $249-69% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $590 | $15-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.5+855% | 5.6 |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 21 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #11 | #42 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and RADEON X800 GT
