GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Per Dollar RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 186.8% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+186.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-186.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 1140 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,009 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU's 11,009 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 186.8%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 4 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2,048 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4.669 TFLOPS (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1140 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 16 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) with 240 Tensor cores vs 64.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+187% | 11,009 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+275% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+759% | 4.669 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+129% | 1140 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240+275% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+275% | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+2300% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60+275% | 16 |
| Tensor Cores | 240+275% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2 MB (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+2300% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU's 35W — a 156.3% difference. The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 500W (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 82mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 35W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 500W-29% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | 82mm |
| Height | 112mm | 4mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8 | 314.5+184% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $590 | — |
| Codename | AD104 | GA107S |
| Release | January 3 2023 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #11 | #246 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
