
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

RTX A4500
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU vs RTX A4500 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU vs RTX A4500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU vs RTX A4500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅57.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
RTX A4500
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU vs RTX A4500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points.

RTX A4500
The RTX A4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,094 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU scores 20,312 and the RTX A4500 reaches 21,094 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A4500 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 7,168 (RTX A4500). Raw compute: 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 23.65 TFLOPS (RTX A4500). Boost clocks: 2550 MHz vs 1650 MHz. Ray tracing: 100 RT cores (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 56 (RTX A4500) with 400 Tensor cores vs 224.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312 | 21,094+4% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 12800+79% | 7168 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 65.28 TFLOPS+176% | 23.65 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2550 MHz+55% | 1650 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+83% | 96 |
| TMUs | 400+79% | 224 |
| L1 Cache | 12.5 MB+79% | 7 MB |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+1100% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 100+79% | 56 |
| Tensor Cores | 400+79% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX A4500 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the RTX A4500 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 carries 2 GB. RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4500) — a 28.6% advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU and 192-bit on the RTX A4500. L2 Cache: 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 6 MB (RTX A4500) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+700% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s+29% | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+1100% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 12.1 (RTX A4500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A4500). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4500).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU draws 175W versus the RTX A4500's 200W — a 13.3% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 450W (RTX A4500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W-13% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 450W-31% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 116.1+10% | 105.5 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $1699 |
| Codename | AD102 | GA102 |
| Release | August 9 2023 | November 23 2021 |
| Ranking | #16 | #68 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














