RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU vs TITAN RTX
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
TITAN RTX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the TITAN RTX offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU and TITAN RTX
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points.
TITAN RTX
The TITAN RTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 18 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 280W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,095 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU scores 20,312 and the TITAN RTX reaches 20,095 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the TITAN RTX uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 4,608 (TITAN RTX). Raw compute: 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (TITAN RTX). Boost clocks: 2550 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 100 RT cores (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 72 (TITAN RTX) with 400 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+1% | 20,095 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 12800+178% | 4608 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 65.28 TFLOPS+300% | 16.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2550 MHz+44% | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+83% | 96 |
| TMUs | 400+39% | 288 |
| L1 Cache | 12.5 MB+178% | 4.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+1100% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 100+39% | 72 |
| Tensor Cores | 400 | 576+44% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN RTX has 24 GB. The TITAN RTX offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 672 GB/s (TITAN RTX) — a 16.7% advantage for the TITAN RTX. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 6 MB (TITAN RTX) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 24 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s | 672 GB/s+17% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+1100% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 12 Ultimate (TITAN RTX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (TITAN RTX). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (TITAN RTX).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU draws 175W versus the TITAN RTX's 280W — a 46.2% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 650W (TITAN RTX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W-38% | 280W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 116mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 116.1+62% | 71.8 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $1203.96 |
| Codename | AD102 | TU102 |
| Release | August 9 2023 | December 18 2018 |
| Ranking | #16 | #91 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU and TITAN RTX
