RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon PRO W7700
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO W7700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W7700.
| Insight | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile and Radeon PRO W7700
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1425 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,379 points.
Radeon PRO W7700
The Radeon PRO W7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,062 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile scores 23,379 and the Radeon PRO W7700 reaches 23,062 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7700 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 9,728 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 3,072 (Radeon PRO W7700). Raw compute: 41.15 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 31.95 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7700). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 76 RT cores (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 48 (Radeon PRO W7700) with 304 Tensor cores.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 23,379+1% | 23,062 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 9728+217% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 41.15 TFLOPS+29% | 31.95 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | 2600 MHz+65% |
| ROPs | 112+17% | 96 |
| TMUs | 304+58% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 9.5 MB+1167% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB+3100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 76+58% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 16 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7700) — a 33.3% advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 64 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7700) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s+33% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB+3100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7700). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7700).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile draws 115W versus the Radeon PRO W7700's 190W — a 49.2% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 175W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 550W (Radeon PRO W7700). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-39% | 190W |
| Recommended PSU | 175W-68% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 203.3+67% | 121.4 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile and Radeon PRO W7700
