RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
Performance Per Dollar RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (2 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile and RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1425 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,379 points.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile scores 23,379 and the RTX 4000 Ada Generation reaches 24,046 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 9,728 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 41.15 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 76 RT cores (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) with 304 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 23,379 | 24,046+3% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 9728+58% | 6144 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 41.15 TFLOPS+54% | 26.73 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+75% | 64 |
| TMUs | 304+58% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 9.5 MB+58% | 6 MB |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB+33% | 48 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 76+58% | 48 |
| Tensor Cores | 304+58% | 192 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 2 GB. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — a 60% advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile. Bus width: 256-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 64 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+700% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s+60% | 360 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+60% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB+33% | 48 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | 8th Gen NVENC (3x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile draws 115W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 48.6% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 175W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 70W-39% |
| Recommended PSU | 175W-77% | 750W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 203.3 | 343.5+69% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile and RTX 4000 Ada Generation
