
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

RTX 5880 Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile vs RTX 5880 Ada Generation Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile vs RTX 5880 Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile vs RTX 5880 Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 285W, a 170W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5880 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (304 vs 440), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
2024Why buy it
- ✅4.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅44.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (440 vs 304).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 16 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌147.8% higher power demand at 285W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile vs RTX 5880 Ada Generation Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1425 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,379 points.

RTX 5880 Ada Generation
The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 14080 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 110 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,096 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile scores 23,379 versus the RTX 5880 Ada Generation's 25,096 — the RTX 5880 Ada Generation leads by 7.3%. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 5880 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 9,728 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 14,080 (RTX 5880 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 41.15 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 69.27 TFLOPS (RTX 5880 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 2460 MHz. Ray tracing: 76 RT cores (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 110 (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) with 304 Tensor cores vs 440.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 23,379 | 25,096+7% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 9728 | 14080+45% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 41.15 TFLOPS | 69.27 TFLOPS+68% |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | 2460 MHz+56% |
| ROPs | 112 | 176+57% |
| TMUs | 304 | 440+45% |
| L1 Cache | 9.5 MB | 13.8 MB+45% |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB | 72 MB+13% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 76 | 110+45% |
| Tensor Cores | 304 | 440+45% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX 5880 Ada Generation does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the RTX 5880 Ada Generation is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 5880 Ada Generation carries 48 GB. RTX 5880 Ada Generation gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 768 GB/s (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) — a 33.3% advantage for the RTX 5880 Ada Generation. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile and 384-bit on the RTX 5880 Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 64 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 72 MB (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) — the RTX 5880 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 48 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s | 768 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 64 MB | 72 MB+13% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 5880 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs NVENC 8th gen (RTX 5880 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP8,VP9 (RTX 5880 Ada Generation).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile draws 115W versus the RTX 5880 Ada Generation's 285W — a 85% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 175W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 650W (RTX 5880 Ada Generation). Power connectors: Mobile vs 16-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-60% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 175W-73% | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 16-pin |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 203.3+131% | 88.1 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RTX 5880 Ada Generation (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $6000 |
| Codename | AD103 | AD102 |
| Release | March 21 2023 | January 5 2024 |
| Ranking | #49 | #40 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














