RTX A1000 Embedded GPU vs Tesla M40 24GB
RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Tesla M40 24GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M40 24GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla M40 24GB lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla M40 24GB.
| Insight | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.5%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A1000 Embedded GPU and Tesla M40 24GB
RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 1140 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,009 points.
Tesla M40 24GB
The Tesla M40 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,641 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU scores 11,009 and the Tesla M40 24GB reaches 10,641 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is built on Ampere while the Tesla M40 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40 24GB). Raw compute: 4.669 TFLOPS (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40 24GB). Boost clocks: 1140 MHz vs 1112 MHz.
| Feature | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,009+3% | 10,641 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3072+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.669 TFLOPS | 6.832 TFLOPS+46% |
| Boost Clock | 1140 MHz+3% | 1112 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 64 | 192+200% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+82% | 1.1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) vs 3 MB (Tesla M40 24GB) — the Tesla M40 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) vs 12.1 (Tesla M40 24GB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla M40 24GB). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla M40 24GB).
| Feature | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU draws 35W versus the Tesla M40 24GB's 250W — a 150.9% difference. The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) vs 500W (Tesla M40 24GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 82mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-86% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 82mm | 267mm |
| Height | 4mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 314.5+638% | 42.6 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $120 |
| Codename | GA107S | GM200 |
| Release | March 30 2022 | November 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #246 | #253 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A1000 Embedded GPU and Tesla M40 24GB
