Radeon Pro SSG vs RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
Radeon Pro SSG
Popular choices:
RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro SSG
Performance Per Dollar RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is significantly newer (2022 vs 2016). The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro SSG lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro SSG.
| Insight | Radeon Pro SSG | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro SSG and RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
Radeon Pro SSG
The Radeon Pro SSG is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,972 points. Launch price was $9,999.
RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 1140 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,009 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro SSG scores 10,972 and the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU reaches 11,009 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro SSG is built on GCN 3.0 while the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 2,048 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 4.669 TFLOPS (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1140 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,972 | 11,009 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+100% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.602 TFLOPS+84% | 4.669 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 1140 MHz+9% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 256+300% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 2 MB (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) — the Radeon Pro SSG has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU).
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro SSG draws 260W versus the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU's 35W — a 152.5% difference. The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 500W (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 82mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 35W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 82mm |
| Height | 111mm | 4mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 42.2 | 314.5+645% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6999 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1500 | — |
| Codename | Fiji | GA107S |
| Release | July 26 2016 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #249 | #246 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro SSG and RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
