Radeon Pro SSG vs RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

AMD

Radeon Pro SSG

2016Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1050 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

2022Core: 607 MHzBoost: 1177 MHz
Similar parts

Radeon Pro SSG vs RTX A2000 Embedded GPU Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro SSG vs RTX A2000 Embedded GPU FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro SSG vs RTX A2000 Embedded GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro SSG

2016

Why buy it

  • 23.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 642.9% higher power demand at 260W vs 35W.
  • 225.6% longer card at 267mm vs 82mm.

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

2022

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 35W instead of 260W, a 225W reduction.
  • Measures 82mm instead of 267mm, a 185mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro SSG across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro SSG is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 23.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward RTX A2000 Embedded GPU instead at 11,117 vs 10,972, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 20 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro SSG makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro SSG is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RTX A2000 Embedded GPU has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro SSG vs RTX A2000 Embedded GPU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Pro SSG

The Radeon Pro SSG is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,972 points. Launch price was $9,999.

NVIDIA

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 607 MHz to 1177 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,117 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro SSG scores 10,972 and the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU reaches 11,117 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro SSG is built on GCN 3.0 while the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 2,560 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 6.026 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1177 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro SSGRTX A2000 Embedded GPU
G3D Mark Score
10,972
11,117+1%
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Ampere
Process Node
28 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
4096+60%
2560
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.602 TFLOPS+43%
6.026 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1177 MHz+12%
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
256+220%
80
L1 Cache
1 MB
2.5 MB+150%
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro SSG leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureRadeon Pro SSGRTX A2000 Embedded GPU
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro SSG and 128-bit on the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 2 MB (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) — the Radeon Pro SSG has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro SSGRTX A2000 Embedded GPU
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon Pro SSGRTX A2000 Embedded GPU
DirectX
12.1
12.2
Vulkan
1.3
1.4+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU).

FeatureRadeon Pro SSGRTX A2000 Embedded GPU
Encoder
VCE 4.0
7th Gen NVENC
Decoder
UVD 7.0
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro SSG draws 260W versus the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU's 35W — a 152.5% difference. The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 500W (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 82mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

FeatureRadeon Pro SSGRTX A2000 Embedded GPU
TDP
260W
35W-87%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
82mm
Height
111mm
4mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
75°C-12%
Perf/Watt
42.2
317.6+653%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RTX A2000 Embedded GPU (2022 vs 2016).

FeatureRadeon Pro SSGRTX A2000 Embedded GPU
MSRP
$6999
Codename
Fiji
GA107S
Release
July 26 2016
March 30 2022
Ranking
#249
#243

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.